Category: Comparisons

  • Hyundai IONIQ 5 N vs Kia EV6 GT

    On paper, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 N and Kia EV6 GT look like two riffs on the same Korean performance EV formula: big power, dual motors, all-wheel drive and enough instant torque to make traditional hot hatches look like they’ve brought a spoon to a knife fight. But in character they are much further apart.

    The EV6 GT is the sleek, fast, slightly grown-up grand tourer — a car that takes Kia’s sharp electric crossover shape and injects it with serious straight-line pace.

    The IONIQ 5 N, meanwhile, is Hyundai’s full-send engineering department let loose: louder in attitude, more playful in calibration, and deliberately designed to feel like more than just another very fast battery-powered appliance.

    Use the table below to compare the key specs, including power, torque, kerb weight, 0-62 mph, top speed, and battery technology.

    StatisticsHyundai IONIQ 5 NKia EV6 GT
    Power650 PS650 PS
    Torque770 Nm770 Nm
    Kerb weight2235 kg2220 kg
    Power-to-weight286.8 bhp/tonne288.7 bhp/tonne
    0-62 mph3.5 sec3.5 sec
    Top speed162 mph161 mph
    Fuel typeElectricElectric
    Drivetrain4AWD4AWD
    Battery capacity84 kWh84 kWh
    Electric range278 miles279 miles
    Electric motor count22
    Peak DC charging350 kW350 kW
    10-80% charging time18 min18 min
    Combined MPG0 mpg
    CO20 g/km0 g/km
    EngineDual Electric MotorsDual electric motors
    Cylinders00
    Induction typeNot applicableNot applicable
    GearboxSingle-speed automaticSingle-speed automatic
    Insurance group4946E
    Origin🇰🇷KR🇰🇷KR
    Production years2023 on2025 on

    So much in common

    Underneath the branding, these two cars are close relatives. Both come from the Hyundai Motor Group stable, both use the group’s advanced electric architecture, and both follow the same broad recipe: a large battery, rapid-charging capability, dual-motor all-wheel drive and the sort of acceleration that would have seemed supercar-adjacent not long ago.

    They also occupy similar territory in the market: not quite conventional hot hatches, not quite SUVs, and not quite grand tourers, but something new in the middle — practical, rapid, high-tech performance EVs with real everyday usability.

    That shared DNA matters. Both cars give you five-door practicality, big-car refinement, instant throttle response and the security of all-wheel-drive traction. Both make a strong case for the idea that the next generation of performance hatchback is not going to be small, light and petrol-powered, but wide, heavy, battery-fed and devastatingly quick. The difference is not so much what they can do, but how they want to make you feel while doing it.

    Which should you pick? And why is it the Hyundai IONIQ 5 N?

    Choose the IONIQ 5 N if you want a more theatrical car. It feels like Hyundai has tried to engineer back some of the drama that EVs often remove: gearshift simulation, track-focused modes, aggressive chassis tuning and a general sense that the car wants to be played with rather than simply deployed. It is the one for drivers who still care about interaction, humour and a bit of engineered mischief. It may be heavier and more complex than a traditional hot hatch, but it is also trying much harder to keep the driver involved.

    The IONIQ 5 N is also the more convincing enthusiast statement. It is not just “the fast one”; it is the one with a philosophy. If your idea of a performance EV is something that should entertain on a B-road, survive a track day and make every journey feel like an event, the Hyundai is the more compelling choice. It is less subtle, less restrained and probably less sensible — which, in this context, is rather the point.

  • SEAT Ibiza Cupra (2012) vs Volkswagen Polo GTI (2012)

    Strip away the badges, trim flourishes and showroom positioning, and the 2012 SEAT Ibiza Cupra and Volkswagen Polo GTI are very close relatives indeed. Both use the Volkswagen Group’s 1.4-litre twincharged engine, both channel their power through a seven-speed DSG gearbox, and both sit on the same broad small-car performance template: compact, quick, grippy and just grown-up enough to feel more serious than the average warmed-over supermini.

    Yet they are not quite interchangeable. The Polo GTI plays the familiar Volkswagen card: polished, discreet and slightly buttoned-down, with a sense that its performance has been carefully folded into the overall package. The Ibiza Cupra, meanwhile, wears the same mechanical hardware with a sharper crease in its shirt — more overtly styled, more youthful in attitude, and more willing to remind you that it is supposed to be the fun one.

    StatisticsSEAT Ibiza Cupra (2012)Volkswagen Polo GTI (2012)
    Power180 PS180 PS
    Torque250 Nm250 Nm
    Kerb weight1259 kg1184 kg
    Power-to-weight141.4 bhp/tonne150.3 bhp/tonne
    0-62 mph6.9 sec6.9 sec
    Top speed142 mph142 mph
    Fuel typePetrolPetrol
    DrivetrainFFWDFFWD
    Combined MPG47 mpg47 mpg
    CO2139 g/km139 g/km
    Engine1.4-litre1.4-litre
    Cylinders44
    Induction typeTwin-chargedTwin-charged
    Gearbox7-speed dual-clutch automatic7-speed dual-clutch automatic
    Insurance group28
    Origin🇪🇸ES🇩🇪DE
    Production years2012-20162012-2017

    Choosing between them is less about raw ability than about what you want the car to say about itself. The Polo GTI is the more mature proposition: subtler, classier inside, easier to live with if you prefer your performance car to blend into the background. It feels like the car for someone who wants the pace without the theatre, the badge without the bravado, and a small hot hatch that can pass as a sensible everyday Volkswagen until the road opens up. For some buyers, that restraint will be precisely the point.

    The Ibiza Cupra makes a different case. It offers much the same mechanical recipe, but wraps it in a more extrovert package, usually with a keener sense of value and a bit more visual intent. It may not have quite the same perceived polish as the Polo, but it has a stronger sense of character, and that matters in a class where emotional appeal counts for plenty. If the Volkswagen is the safer, more rounded choice, the SEAT is the one you pick because you want the same ingredients served with a little more spice.

  • Ford Fiesta ST (2013) vs Volkswagen Polo GTI (2012)

    The Ford Fiesta ST (2013) and Volkswagen Polo GTI (2012) are two small hot hatches with very different characters. The Fiesta ST is the lighter, manual-only driver-focused option, while the Polo GTI brings a twin-charged engine and dual-clutch gearbox for a more polished everyday feel.

    Use the table below to compare the key specs, including power, torque, kerb weight, 0-62 mph, top speed, fuel economy and CO2 emissions.

    StatisticsFord Fiesta ST (2013)Volkswagen Polo GTI (2012)
    Power182 PS180 PS
    Torque240 Nm250 Nm
    Kerb weight1163 kg1184 kg
    Power-to-weight154.8 bhp/tonne150.3 bhp/tonne
    0-62 mph6.9 sec6.9 sec
    Top speed137 mph142 mph
    Fuel typePetrolPetrol
    DrivetrainFFWDFFWD
    Combined MPG47.9 mpg47 mpg
    CO2138 g/km139 g/km
    Engine1.6-litre1.4-litre
    Cylinders44
    Induction typeTurbochargedTwin-charged
    Gearbox6-speed manual7-speed dual-clutch automatic
    Insurance group30
    Origin🇩🇪DE🇩🇪DE
    Production years2013-20172012-2017

    Which is faster?

    On paper, the Ford Fiesta ST and Volkswagen Polo GTI are closely matched from 0-62 mph, with both listed at 6.9 seconds. The Polo GTI has the higher top speed at 142 mph, but the Fiesta ST counters with slightly more power and a better power-to-weight figure.

    Which is cheaper to run?

    The Fiesta ST has a small advantage for running costs, with a slightly better combined MPG figure and lower CO2 output. The difference is not huge, but it gives the Ford a narrow edge if fuel economy and emissions matter.

    Which should you buy?

    Choose the Ford Fiesta ST if you want a more focused hot hatch experience, a manual gearbox and the strongest power-to-weight figure. Choose the Volkswagen Polo GTI if you prefer a more refined small hot hatch with a dual-clutch automatic gearbox, stronger torque and a higher top speed.

    For the underlying stats, see the individual model pages for the Ford Fiesta ST (2013) and Volkswagen Polo GTI (2012).